MOG Antibodies Restricted to CSF in Children With Inflammatory CNS Disorders.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical significance of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-abs) restricted to CSF in children with inflammatory CNS disorders. METHODS: Patients included 760 children (younger than 18 years) from 3 multicenter prospective cohort studies: (A) acquired demyelinating syndromes, including acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM); (B) non-ADEM encephalitis; and (C) noninflammatory neurologic disorders. For all cases, paired serum/CSF samples were systematically examined using brain immunohistochemistry and live cell-based assays. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients (14%) had MOG-abs in serum or CSF: 79 from cohort A, 30 from B, and none from C. Of these, 63 (58%) had antibodies in both samples, 37 (34%) only in serum, and 9 (8%) only in CSF. Children with MOG-abs only in CSF were older than those with MOG-abs only in serum or in both samples (median 12 vs 6 vs 5 years, p = 0.0002) and were more likely to have CSF oligoclonal bands (86% vs 12% vs 7%, p = 0.0001) and be diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (6/9 [67%] vs 0/37 [0%] vs 1/63 [2%], p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Detection of MOG-abs in serum or CSF is associated with CNS inflammatory disorders. Children with MOG-abs restricted to CSF are more likely to have CSF oligoclonal bands and multiple sclerosis than those with MOG-abs detectable in serum.

Excellent response to anti-CD38 therapy with daratumumab in a patient with severe refractory CANOMAD.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and rituximab are considered the first-line and second-line treatments for Chronic Ataxic Neuropathy and Ophthalmoplegia with IgM-paraprotein, cold Agglutinins, and anti-Disialosyl antibodies (CANOMAD), with an overall clinical response around 50%. New anti-CD38 daratumumab, targeting long-lived plasma cells, has been reported as a promising therapy for treatment-refractory antibody-mediated disorders. We report the first case of a severe refractory CANOMAD, successfully treated with daratumumab. METHODS: A patient in their 70s with severe relapsing CANOMAD, refractory to IVIG, steroids, rituximab and ibrutinib developed severe tetraparesis and respiratory failure. Plasma exchange (PE) improved motor and ventilatory function; however, after 6 weeks, patient remained PE dependent. Intravenous daratumumab was initiated at 16 mg/kg weekly for 3 weeks, every 2 weeks for the second and third month, and monthly afterwards. RESULTS: After 3 weeks of starting daratumumab, PE was discontinued and, since then, the patient evolved to complete recovery. Antidisialosyl antibody titres decreased after PE and remained stable during daratumumab. Serum neurofilament light-chain levels were elevated in the exacerbation phase and normalised after daratumumab. The patient remains in clinical remission under monthly daratumumab, 12 months after initiation. CONCLUSIONS: The first patient with aggressive treatment-refractory CANOMAD treated with daratumumab provides proof-of-principle evidence that daratumumab may be an effective treatment in IgM-related neuropathies.

Neurological, psychiatric, and sleep investigations after treatment of anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 (LGI1) encephalitis in Spain: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 (LGI1) encephalitis is an autoimmune disorder that can be treated with immunotherapy, but the symptoms that remain after treatment have not been well described. We aimed to characterise the clinical features of patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis for 1 year starting within the first year after initial immunotherapy. METHODS: For this prospective cohort study, we recruited patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis as soon as possible after they had received conventional immunotherapy for initial symptoms; patients were recruited from 21 hospitals in Spain. Patients were excluded if they had an interval of more than 1 year since initial immunotherapy, had pre-existing neurodegenerative or psychiatric disorders, or were unable to travel to Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (Barcelona, Spain). Patients visited Hospital Clínic de Barcelona on three occasions-the first at study entry (visit 1), the second 6 months later (visit 2), and the third 12 months after the initial visit (visit 3). They underwent neuropsychiatric and videopolysomnography assessments at each visit. Healthy participants who were matched for age and sex and recruited from Hospital Clínic de Barcelona underwent the same investigations at study entry and at 12 months. Cross-sectional comparisons of clinical features between groups were done with conditional logistic regression, and binary logistic regression was used to assess associations between cognitive outcomes at 12 months and clinical features before initial immunotherapy and at study entry. FINDINGS: Between May 1, 2019, and Sept 30, 2022, 42 participants agreed to be included in this study. 24 (57%) participants had anti-LGI1 encephalitis (mean age 63 years [SD 12]; 13 [54%] were female and 11 [46%] were male) and 18 (43%) were healthy individuals (mean age 62 years [10]; 11 [61%] were female and seven [39%] were male). At visit 1 (median 88 days [IQR 67-155] from initiation of immunotherapy), all 24 patients had one or more symptoms; 20 (83%) patients had cognitive deficits, 20 (83%) had psychiatric symptoms, 14 (58%) had insomnia, 12 (50%) had rapid eye movement (REM)-sleep behaviour disorder, nine (38%) had faciobrachial dystonic seizures, and seven (29%) had focal onset seizures. Faciobrachial dystonic seizures were unnoticed in four (17%) of 24 patients and focal onset seizures were unnoticed in five (21%) patients. At visit 1, videopolysomnography showed that 19 (79%) patients, but no healthy participants, had disrupted sleep structure (p=0·013); 15 (63%) patients and four (22%) healthy participants had excessive fragmentary myoclonus (p=0·039), and nine (38%) patients, but no healthy participants, had myokymic discharges (p=0·0051). These clinical and videopolysomnographic features led to additional immunotherapy in 15 (63%) of 24 patients, which resulted in improvement of these features in all 15 individuals. However, at visit 3, 13 (65%) of 20 patients continued to have cognitive deficits. Persistent cognitive deficits at visit 3 were associated with no use of rituximab before visit 1 (odds ratio [OR] 4·0, 95% CI 1·5-10·7; p=0·0015), REM sleep without atonia at visit 1 (2·2, 1·2-4·2; p=0·043), and presence of LGI1 antibodies in serum at visit 1 (11·0, 1·1-106·4; p=0·038). INTERPRETATION: Unsuspected but ongoing clinical and videopolysomnography alterations are common in patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis during the first year or more after initial immunotherapy. Recognising these alterations is important as they are treatable, can be used as outcome measures in clinical trials, and might influence cognitive outcome. FUNDING: Fundació La Caixa.

Neurological adverse events related to immune-checkpoint inhibitors in Spain: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Neurological immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors can have several clinical manifestations, but the syndromes and prognostic factors are still not well known. We aimed to characterise and group the clinical features, with a special focus in patients presenting with encephalopathy, and to identify predictors of response to therapy and survival. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients with neurological immune-related adverse events from 20 hospitals in Spain whose clinical information, serum samples, and CSF samples were studied at Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. Patients with pre-existing paraneoplastic syndromes or evidence of alternative causes for their neurological symptoms were excluded. We reviewed the clinical information, classified their clinical features, and determined the presence of neural antibodies. Neurological status was assessed by the treating physician one month after adverse event onset (as improvement vs no improvement) and at the last evaluation (complete recovery or modified Rankin Scale score decrease of at least 2 points, indicating good outcome, vs all other modified Rankin Scale scores, indicating poor outcome); if the participant had died, the date and cause of death were recorded. We used Fisher's exact tests and Mann-Whitney U tests to analyse clinical features, and multivariable logistic regression to analyse prognostic factors. FINDINGS: From Jan 1, 2018, until Feb 1, 2023, 83 patients with suspected neurological immune-related adverse events after use of immune checkpoint inhibitors were identified, of whom 64 patients were included. These patients had a median age of 67 years (IQR 59-74); 42 (66%) were male and 22 (34%) were female. The predominant tumours were lung cancer (30 [47%] patients), melanoma (13 [21%] patients), and renal cell carcinoma (seven [11%] patients). Neural antibodies were detected in 14 (22%) patients; 52 (81%) patients had CNS involvement and 12 (19%) had peripheral nervous system involvement. Encephalopathy occurred in 45 (70%) patients, 12 (27%) of whom had antibodies or well defined syndromes consistent with definite paraneoplastic or autoimmune encephalitis, 24 (53%) of whom had encephalitis without antibodies or clinical features characteristic of a defined syndrome, and nine (20%) of whom had encephalopathy without antibodies or inflammatory changes in CSF or brain MRI. Nine (14%) of 64 patients had combined myasthenia and myositis, five of them with myocarditis. Even though 58 (91%) of 64 patients received steroids and 31 (48%) of 64 received additional therapies, 18 (28%) did not improve during the first month after adverse event onset, and 11 of these 18 people died. At the last follow-up for the 53 remaining patients (median 6 months, IQR 3-13), 20 (38%) had a poor outcome (16 deaths, one related to a neurological immune-related adverse event). Mortality risk was increased in patients with lung cancer (vs those with other cancers: HR 2·5, 95% CI 1·1-6·0) and in patients with encephalopathy without evidence of CNS inflammation or combined myocarditis, myasthenia, and myositis (vs those with the remaining syndromes: HR 5·0, 1·4-17·8 and HR 6·6, 1·4-31·0, respectively). INTERPRETATION: Most neurological immune-related adverse events involved the CNS and were antibody negative. The presence of myocarditis, myasthenia, and myositis, of encephalopathy without inflammatory changes, or of lung cancer were independent predictors of death. Most deaths occurred during the first month of symptom onset. If our findings are replicated in additional cohorts, they could confirm that these patients need early and intensive treatment. FUNDING: The Instituto de Salud Carlos III and the European Union.

mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination Does Not Exacerbate Symptoms or Trigger Neural Antibody Responses in Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), concern for potential disease exacerbation or triggering of other autoimmune disorders contributes to vaccine hesitancy. We assessed the humoral and T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 after mRNA vaccination, changes in disease activity, and development of antibodies against central or peripheral nervous system antigens. METHODS: This was a prospective 1-year longitudinal observational study of pwMS and a control group of patients with other inflammatory neurologic disorders (OIND) who received an mRNA vaccine. Blood samples were obtained before the first dose (T1), 1 month after the first dose (T2), 1 month after the second dose (T3), and 6 (T4), 9 (T5), and 12 (T6) months after the first dose. Patients were assessed for the immune-specific response, annualized relapse rate (ARR), and antibodies to onconeuronal, neural surface, glial, ganglioside, and nodo-paranodal antigens. RESULTS: Among 454 patients studied, 390 had MS (22 adolescents) and 64 OIND; the mean (SD) age was 44 (14) years; 315 (69%) were female; and 392 (87%) were on disease-modifying therapies. Antibodies to the receptor-binding domain were detected in 367 (86%) patients at T3 and 276 (83%) at T4. After a third dose, only 13 (22%) of 60 seronegative patients seroconverted, and 255 (92%) remained seropositive at T6. Cellular responses were present in 381 (93%) patients at T3 and in 235 (91%) patients at T6 including all those receiving anti-CD20 therapies and in 79% of patients receiving fingolimod. At T3 (429 patients) or T6 (395 patients), none of the patients had developed CNS autoantibodies. Seven patients had neural antibodies that were already present before immunization (3 adult patients with MS had MOG-IgG, 2 with MG and 1 with MS had neuronal cell surface antibodies [unknown antigen], and 1 with MS had myelin antibody reactivity [unknown antigen]. Similarly, no antibodies against PNS antigens were identified at T3 (427 patients). ARR was lower in MS and not significantly different in patients with OIND. Although 182 (40%) patients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection, no cases of severe COVID-19 or serious adverse events occurred. DISCUSSION: In this study, mRNA COVID-19 vaccination was safe and did not exacerbate the autoimmune disease nor triggered neural autoantibodies or immune-mediated neurologic disorders. The outcome of patients who developed SARS-CoV-2 infection was favorable.

Neurologic complications in herpes simplex encephalitis: clinical, immunological and genetic studies.

Patients with herpes simplex virus (HSV) encephalitis (HSE) often develop neuronal autoantibody-associated encephalitis (AE) post-infection. Risk factors of AE are unknown. We tested the hypotheses that predisposition for AE post-HSE may be involved, including genetic variants at specific loci, human leucocyte (HLA) haplotypes, or the blood innate immune response against HSV, including type I interferon (IFN) immunity. Patients of all ages with HSE diagnosed between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2021 were included in one of two cohorts depending on whether the recruitment was at HSE onset (Spanish Cohort A) or by the time of new neurological manifestations (international Cohort B). Patients were assessed for the type of neurological syndromes; HLA haplotypes; blood type I-IFN signature [RNA quantification of 6 or 28 IFN-response genes (IRG)] and toll-like receptor (TLR3)-type I IFN-related gene mutations. Overall, 190 patients (52% male) were recruited, 93 in Cohort A and 97 in Cohort B. Thirty-nine (42%) patients from Cohort A developed neuronal autoantibodies, and 21 (54%) of them developed AE. Three syndromes (choreoathetosis, anti-NMDAR-like encephalitis and behavioural-psychiatric) showed a high (≥95% cases) association with neuronal autoantibodies. Patients who developed AE post-HSE were less likely to carry the allele HLA-A*02 (4/21, 19%) than those who did not develop AE (42/65, 65%, P = 0.0003) or the Spanish general population (2005/4335, 46%, P = 0.0145). Blood IFN signatures using 6 or 28 IRG were positive in 19/21 (91%) and 18/21 (86%) patients at HSE onset, and rapidly decreased during follow-up. At Day 21 after HSE onset, patients who later developed AE had higher median IFN signature compared with those who did not develop AE [median Zs-6-IRG 1.4 (0.6; 2.0) versus 0.2 (-0.4; 0.8), P = 0.03]. However, a very high median Zs-6-IRG (>4) or persistently increased IFN signature associated with uncontrolled viral infection. Whole exome sequencing showed that the percentage of TLR3-IFN-related mutations in patients who developed AE was not different from those who did not develop AE [3/37 (8%) versus 2/57 (4%), P = 0.379]. Multivariate logistic regression showed that a moderate increase of the blood IFN signature at Day 21 (median Zs-6-IRG >1.5 but <4) was the most important predictor of AE post-HSE [odds ratio 34.8, interquartile ratio (1.7-691.9)]. Altogether, these findings show that most AE post-HSE manifest with three distinct syndromes, and HLA-A*02, but not TLR3-IFN-related mutations, confer protection from developing AE. In addition to neuronal autoantibodies, the blood IFN signature in the context of HSE may be potentially useful for the diagnosis and monitoring of HSE complications.

Frequency and Referral Patterns of Neural Antibody Studies During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Experience From an Autoimmune Neurology Center.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the frequency of paraneoplastic or autoimmune encephalitis antibodies examined in a referral center changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The number of patients who tested positive for neuronal or glial (neural) antibodies during pre-COVID-19 (2017-2019) and COVID-19 (2020-2021) periods was compared. The techniques used for antibody testing did not change during these periods and included a comprehensive evaluation of cell-surface and intracellular neural antibodies. The chi-square test, Spearman correlation, and Python programming language v3 were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Serum or CSF from 15,390 patients with suspected autoimmune or paraneoplastic encephalitis was examined. The overall positivity rate for antibodies against neural-surface antigens was similar in the prepandemic and pandemic periods (neuronal 3.2% vs 3.5%; glial 6.1 vs 5.2) with a mild single-disease increase in the pandemic period (anti-NMDAR encephalitis). By contrast, the positivity rate for antibodies against intracellular antigens was significantly increased during the pandemic period (2.8% vs 3.9%, p = 0.01), particularly Hu and GFAP. DISCUSSION: Our findings do not support that the COVID-19 pandemic led to a substantial increase of known or novel encephalitis mediated by antibodies against neural-surface antigens. The increase in Hu and GFAP antibodies likely reflects the progressive increased recognition of the corresponding disorders.

Significance of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibodies in CSF: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although the diagnosis of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is based on serum MOG antibodies (MOG-Abs) positivity, patients with coexisting or restricted MOG-Abs in the CSF have been reported. The aim of this study is to characterize the relevance of CSF MOG-Abs positivity in clinical practice. METHODS: Eleven medical centers retrospectively collected clinical and laboratory data of adult and pediatric patients with suspected inflammatory CNS disease and MOG-Abs positivity in serum and/or CSF using live cell-based assays. Comparisons were performed using parametric or nonparametric tests, as appropriate. Potential factors of unfavorable outcomes were explored by Cox proportional hazard models and logistic regression. RESULTS: The cohort included 255 patients: 139 (55%) women and 132 (52%) children (i.e., <18-year-old). Among them, 145 patients (56.8%) had MOG-Abs in both serum and CSF (MOG-Abs seropositive and CSF positive), 79 (31%) only in serum (MOG-Abs seropositive and CSF negative), and 31 (12%) only in CSF (MOG-Abs seronegative and CSF positive). MOG-Abs seronegative and CSF positive predominated in adults (22% vs 3% of children), presented more commonly with motor (n = 14, 45%) and sensory symptoms (n = 13, 42%), and all but 4 (2 multiple sclerosis, 1 polyradiculoneuritis, and 1 Susac syndrome) had a final diagnosis compatible with MOGAD. When comparing seropositive patients according to MOG-Abs CSF status, MOG-Abs seropositive and CSF positive patients had a higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at nadir during the index event (median 4.5, interquartile range [IQR] 3.0-7.5 vs 3.0, IQR 2.0-6.8, p = 0.007) and presented more commonly with sensory (45.5% vs 24%, p = 0.002), motor (33.6% vs 19%, p = 0.021), and sphincter symptoms (26.9% vs 7.8%, p = 0.001) than MOG-Abs seropositive and CSF negative. At the last follow-up, MOG-Abs seropositive and CSF positive cases had more often persistent sphincter dysfunction (17.3% vs 4.3%, p = 0.008). Compared with seropositive patients, those MOG-Abs seronegative and CSF positive had higher disability at the last follow-up (p ≤ 0.001), and MOG-Abs seronegative and CSF positive status were independently associated with an EDSS ≥3.0. DISCUSSION: Paired serum and CSF MOG-Abs positivity are common in MOGAD and are associated with a more severe clinical presentation. CSF-only MOG-Abs positivity can occur in patients with a phenotype suggestive of MOGAD and is associated with a worse outcome. Taken together, these data suggest a clinical interest in assessing CSF MOG-Abs in patients with a phenotype suggestive of MOGAD, regardless of the MOG-Abs serostatus.

Thrombosis and thrombocytopenia after vaccination against and infection with SARS-CoV-2 in the United Kingdom.

Population-based studies can provide important evidence on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Using data from the United Kingdom, here we compare observed rates of thrombosis and thrombocytopenia following vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 and infection with SARS-CoV-2 with background (expected) rates in the general population. First and second dose cohorts for ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2 between 8 December 2020 and 2 May 2021 in the United Kingdom were identified. A further cohort consisted of people with no prior COVID-19 vaccination who were infected with SARS-Cov-2 identified by a first positive PCR test between 1 September 2020 and 2 May 2021. The fourth general population cohort for background rates included those people in the database as of 1 January 2017. In total, we included 3,768,517 ChAdOx1 and 1,832,841 BNT162b2 vaccinees, 401,691 people infected with SARS-CoV-2, and 9,414,403 people from the general population. An increased risk of venous thromboembolism was seen after first dose of ChAdOx1 (standardized incidence ratio: 1.12 [95% CI: 1.05 to 1.20]), BNT162b2 (1.12 [1.03 to 1.21]), and positive PCR test (7.27 [6.86 to 7.72]). Rates of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis were higher than otherwise expected after first dose of ChAdOx1 (4.14 [2.54 to 6.76]) and a SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive test (3.74 [1.56 to 8.98]). Rates of arterial thromboembolism after vaccination were no higher than expected but were increased after a SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive test (1.39 [1.21 to 1.61]). Rates of venous thromboembolism with thrombocytopenia were higher than expected after a SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive test (5.76 [3.19 to 10.40]).

Clinical characterisation of patients in the post-acute stage of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: a prospective cohort study and comparison with patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

BACKGROUND: Anti-NMDA receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is associated with a post-acute stage that is not well known. We aimed to describe the clinical features of this stage, similarities with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, and the factors that predict cognitive-psychiatric outcomes and could serve as prognostic biomarkers. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, participants (aged 12-60 years) with anti-NMDAR encephalitis during the post-acute stage visited Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (Barcelona, Spain) on three occasions (at study entry [V1], at 6 months [V2], and at 12 months [V3]) and underwent comprehensive neuropsychiatric evaluations. Similar evaluations were done in a group of age-matched participants with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and a group of age-matched and sex-matched healthy participants also recruited from Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. We analysed differences between and within groups in the longitudinal follow-up using multilevel linear mixed-effect models, adjusting for group, age, sex, and socioeconomic status to control for possible confounding. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2017, and Sept 30, 2020, 82 participants were recruited, 28 (34%) with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, 27 (33%) with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, and 27 (33%) healthy participants. Although, by V1 (median 4 months [IQR 3-7] from disease onset), many acute-stage symptoms in participants with anti-NMDAR encephalitis had resolved (acute stage median modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 5 [IQR 4-5] vs V1 mRS score 2 [1-2]; p<0·0001), 25 (89%) participants showed deficits in at least one cognitive domain. In this group, 15 (68%) of 22 cognitive domain variables were impaired at V1, whereas only eight (36%) were altered at V3 (p=0·016). In participants with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, 11 (50%) of 22 variables (all shared with participants with anti-NMDAR encephalitis) were impaired at V1, without changes at V3. Two acute-stage features of anti-NMDAR encephalitis (ie, decreased consciousness and no improvement within the first 4 weeks of treatment) predicted cognitive domain outcomes, and a visuospatial task (ie, serial biases) at V1 showed potential in predicting learning and memory outcomes. At V1, all psychiatric symptom clusters were similarly altered in participants with anti-NMDAR encephalitis and in those with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, but only those in individuals with anti-NMDAR encephalitis subsequently improved (p=0·031). The greatest cognitive-psychiatric improvement in participants with anti-NMDAR encephalitis occurred between V1 and V2. During this interval, four (14%) participants with anti-NMDAR encephalitis would have met the diagnostic criteria of schizophrenia if CSF antibody findings had not been investigated. INTERPRETATION: The cognitive-psychiatric symptoms of anti-NMDAR encephalitis in the post-acute stage resembled those of stabilised schizophrenia, but only those in participants with anti-NMDAR encephalitis progressively improved, predominantly during V1-V2. These findings are important for clinical trials on anti-NMDAR encephalitis and suggest that prompt cognitive-psychosocial rehabilitation might be a valuable intervention. FUNDING: Instituto Salud Carlos III, NEURON Network of European Funding for Neuroscience Research, National Alliance for Research in Schizophrenia and Affective Disorders, and la Caixa Health-Research Foundation.

CSF Biomarkers in COVID-19 Associated Encephalopathy and Encephalitis Predict Long-Term Outcome.

Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) frequently develop acute encephalopathy and encephalitis, but whether these complications are the result from viral-induced cytokine storm syndrome or anti-neural autoimmunity is still unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic role of CSF and serum biomarkers of inflammation (a wide array of cytokines, antibodies against neural antigens, and IgG oligoclonal bands), and neuroaxonal damage (14-3-3 protein and neurofilament light [NfL]) in patients with acute COVID-19 and associated neurologic manifestations (neuro-COVID). We prospectively included 60 hospitalized neuro-COVID patients, 25 (42%) of them with encephalopathy and 14 (23%) with encephalitis, and followed them for 18 months. We found that, compared to healthy controls (HC), neuro-COVID patients presented elevated levels of IL-18, IL-6, and IL-8 in both serum and CSF. MCP1 was elevated only in CSF, while IL-10, IL-1RA, IP-10, MIG and NfL were increased only in serum. Patients with COVID-associated encephalitis or encephalopathy had distinct serum and CSF cytokine profiles compared with HC, but no differences were found when both clinical groups were compared to each other. Antibodies against neural antigens were negative in both groups. While the levels of neuroaxonal damage markers, 14-3-3 and NfL, and the proinflammatory cytokines IL-18, IL-1RA and IL-8 significantly associated with acute COVID-19 severity, only the levels of 14-3-3 and NfL in CSF significantly correlated with the degree of neurologic disability in the daily activities at 18 months follow-up. Thus, the inflammatory process promoted by SARS-CoV-2 infection might include blood-brain barrier disruption in patients with neurological involvement. In conclusion, the fact that the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines do not predict the long-term functional outcome suggests that the prognosis is more related to neuronal damage than to the acute neuroinflammatory process.

Association between covid-19 vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 infection, and risk of immune mediated neurological events: population based cohort and self-controlled case series analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To study the association between covid-19 vaccines, SARS-CoV-2 infection, and risk of immune mediated neurological events. DESIGN: Population based historical rate comparison study and self-controlled case series analysis. SETTING: Primary care records from the United Kingdom, and primary care records from Spain linked to hospital data. PARTICIPANTS: 8 330 497 people who received at least one dose of covid-19 vaccines ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, or Ad.26.COV2.S between the rollout of the vaccination campaigns and end of data availability (UK: 9 May 2021; Spain: 30 June 2021). The study sample also comprised a cohort of 735 870 unvaccinated individuals with a first positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test result for SARS-CoV-2 from 1 September 2020, and 14 330 080 participants from the general population. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes were incidence of Bell's palsy, encephalomyelitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and transverse myelitis. Incidence rates were estimated in the 21 days after the first vaccine dose, 90 days after a positive test result for SARS-CoV-2, and between 2017 and 2019 for background rates in the general population cohort. Indirectly standardised incidence ratios were estimated. Adjusted incidence rate ratios were estimated from the self-controlled case series. RESULTS: The study included 4 376 535 people who received ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, 3 588 318 who received BNT162b2, 244 913 who received mRNA-1273, and 120 731 who received Ad26.CoV.2; 735 870 people with SARS-CoV-2 infection; and 14 330 080 people from the general population. Overall, post-vaccine rates were consistent with expected (background) rates for Bell's palsy, encephalomyelitis, and Guillain-Barré syndrome. Self-controlled case series was conducted only for Bell's palsy, given limited statistical power, but with no safety signal seen for those vaccinated. Rates were, however, higher than expected after SARS-CoV-2 infection. For example, in the data from the UK, the standardised incidence ratio for Bell's palsy was 1.33 (1.02 to 1.74), for encephalomyelitis was 6.89 (3.82 to 12.44), and for Guillain-Barré syndrome was 3.53 (1.83 to 6.77). Transverse myelitis was rare (<5 events in all vaccinated cohorts) and could not be analysed. CONCLUSIONS: No safety signal was observed between covid-19 vaccines and the immune mediated neurological events of Bell's palsy, encephalomyelitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and transverse myelitis. An increased risk of Bell's palsy, encephalomyelitis, and Guillain-Barré syndrome was, however, observed for people with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Neurofilament Light Chain Levels in Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis and Primary Psychiatric Psychosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: An important challenge in diagnosing anti-NMDA receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis (NMDARe) is differentiating it from a first episode of psychosis (FEP) caused by a psychiatric disease (pFEP). CSF antibody testing distinguishes these diseases, but spinal taps are difficult to obtain in psychiatric facilities. A separate problem is the lack of biomarkers of NMDARe severity and outcome. Here we assessed the performance of neurofilament light chain (NfL) testing in these settings. METHODS: In this observational study, NfL levels were determined with single-molecule array in patients with NMDARe, pFEP, herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE), and healthy participants (HC), with the last 2 groups used as controls. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the prediction accuracy of serum NfL (sNfL) levels for NMDARe and pFEP and to obtain clinically useful cutoffs. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen patients with NMDARe (33 with isolated psychosis at presentation), 45 with pFEP, 36 with HSE, and 36 HC were studied. Patients with NMDARe with seizures/status epilepticus, intensive care unit admission, and CSF pleocytosis (>20 white blood cells/µL) and without early immunotherapy were more likely to have higher NfL (mainly in CSF) than individuals with NMDARe without these features. NfL levels at diagnosis of NMDARe did not correlate with outcome at 1-year follow-up assessed with the modified Rankin Scale. Patients with NMDARe had significantly higher sNfL than individuals with pFEP and HC and lower sNfL than patients with HSE. ROC analysis of sNfL between NMDARe with isolated psychosis and pFEP provided an area under the curve of 0.93 (95% CI 0.87-0.99) and an sNfL cutoff ≥15 pg/mL to distinguish these disorders (sensitivity 85%, specificity 96%, positive likelihood ratio 19.3). Forty-three of 45 (96%) patients with pFEP had sNfL<15 pg/mL, whereas only 5 of 33 (15%) with NMDARe with isolated psychosis were below this cutoff (risk estimation NMDARe vs pFEP: odds ratio 120.4 [95% CI 21.8-664], p < 0.001). None of the patients with HSE and 35 of 36 (97%) HC had sNfL<15 pg/mL. DISCUSSION: NfL measured at diagnosis of NMDARe associated with features of disease severity but not with long-term outcome. Young patients with FEP and sNfL ≥15 pg/mL had a 120 times higher chance of having NMDARe than those with pFEP. This cutoff correctly classified 96% of patients with pFEP and 85% of patients with NMDARe with isolated psychosis. Patients with FEP of unclear etiology and sNfL ≥15 pg/mL should undergo CSF NMDAR antibody testing.

Post-mortem neuropathologic examination of a 6-case series of CAR T-cell treated patients.

Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a promising immunotherapy for the treatment of refractory hematopoietic malignancies. Adverse events are common, and neurotoxicity is one of the most important. However, the physiopathology is unknown and neuropathologic information is scarce. Materials and methods: Post-mortem examination of 6 brains from patients that underwent CAR T-cell therapy from 2017 to 2022. In all cases, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in paraffin blocks for the detection of CAR T cells was performed. Results: Two patients died of hematologic progression, while the others died of cytokine release syndrome, lung infection, encephalomyelitis, and acute liver failure. Two out of 6 presented neurological symptoms, one with extracranial malignancy progression and the other with encephalomyelitis. The neuropathology of the latter showed severe perivascular and interstitial lymphocytic infiltration, predominantly CD8+, together with a diffuse interstitial histiocytic infiltration, affecting mainly the spinal cord, midbrain, and hippocampus, and a diffuse gliosis of basal ganglia, hippocampus, and brainstem. Microbiological studies were negative for neurotropic viruses, and PCR failed to detect CAR T -cells. Another case without detectable neurological signs showed cortical and subcortical gliosis due to acute hypoxic-ischemic damage. The remaining 4 cases only showed a mild patchy gliosis and microglial activation, and CAR T cells were detected by PCR only in one of them. Conclusions: In this series of patients that died after CAR T-cell therapy, we predominantly found non-specific or minimal neuropathological changes. CAR T-cell related toxicity may not be the only cause of neurological symptoms, and the autopsy could detect additional pathological findings.

The diagnosis of anti-LGI1 encephalitis varies with the type of immunodetection assay and sample examined.

Detection of Leucine-rich glioma inactivated 1 (LGI1) antibodies in patients with suspected autoimmune encephalitis is important for diagnostic confirmation and prompt implementation of immunomodulatory treatment. However, the clinical laboratory diagnosis can be challenging. Previous reports have suggested that the type of test and patient's sample (serum or CSF) have different clinical performances, however, there are no studies comparing different diagnostic tests on paired serum/CSF samples of patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis. Here, we assessed the clinical performance of a commercial and an in house indirect immunofluorescent cell based assays (IIF-CBA) using paired serum/CSF of 70 patients with suspected anti-LGI1 encephalitis and positive rat brain indirect immunohistochemistry (IIHC). We found that all (100%) patients had CSF antibodies when the in house IIF-CBA was used, but only 88 (83%) were positive if the commercial test was used. In contrast, sera positivity rate was higher with the commercial test (94%) than with the in house assay (86%). If both serum and CSF were examined with the commercial IIFA-CBA, 69/70 (98.5%) patients were positive in at least one of the samples. These findings are clinically important for centers in which rat brain IIHC and in house IIFA-CBA are not available. Moreover, the observation that all patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis have antibodies in CSF is in line with the concept that these antibodies are pathogenic.

Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis in the Netherlands, Focusing on Late-Onset Patients and Antibody Test Accuracy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical features of anti-NMDAR encephalitis, emphasizing on late-onset patients and antibody test characteristics in serum and CSF. METHODS: Nationwide observational Dutch cohort study, in patients diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis between 2007 and 2019. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis were included with a median age of 24 years (range 1-86 years). The mean annual incidence was 1.00/million (95% CI 0.62-1.59). Patients ≥45 years of age at onset (19%) had fewer seizures (46% vs 71%, p = 0.021), fewer symptoms during disease course (3 vs 6 symptoms, p = 0.020), and more often undetectable serum antibodies compared with younger patients (p = 0.031). In the late-onset group, outcome was worse, and all tumors were carcinomas (both p < 0.0001). CSF was more accurate than serum to detect anti-NMDAR encephalitis (sensitivity 99% vs 68%, p < 0.0001). Using cell-based assay (CBA), CSF provided an unconfirmed positive test result in 11/2,600 patients (0.4%); 6/11 had a neuroinflammatory disease (other than anti-NMDAR encephalitis). Patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, who tested positive in CSF only, had lower CSF antibody titers (p = 0.003), but appeared to have an equally severe disease course. DISCUSSION: Anti-NMDAR encephalitis occurs at all ages and is less rare in the elderly patients than initially anticipated. In older patients, the clinical phenotype is less outspoken, has different tumor association, and a less favorable recovery. Detection of antibodies in CSF is the gold standard, and although the CBA has very good validity, it is not perfect. The clinical phenotype should be leading, and confirmation in a research laboratory is recommended, when in doubt.

Autoantibody screening in Guillain-Barré syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute inflammatory neuropathy with a heterogeneous presentation. Although some evidences support the role of autoantibodies in its pathogenesis, the target antigens remain unknown in a substantial proportion of GBS patients. The objective of this study is to screen for autoantibodies targeting peripheral nerve components in Guillain-Barré syndrome. METHODS: Autoantibody screening was performed in serum samples from all GBS patients included in the International GBS Outcome study by 11 different Spanish centres. The screening included testing for anti-ganglioside antibodies, anti-nodo/paranodal antibodies, immunocytochemistry on neuroblastoma-derived human motor neurons and murine dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons, and immunohistochemistry on monkey peripheral nerve sections. We analysed the staining patterns of patients and controls. The prognostic value of anti-ganglioside antibodies was also analysed. RESULTS: None of the GBS patients (n = 100) reacted against the nodo/paranodal proteins tested, and 61 (61%) were positive for, at least, one anti-ganglioside antibody. GBS sera reacted strongly against DRG neurons more frequently than controls both with IgG (6% vs 0%; p = 0.03) and IgM (11% vs 2.2%; p = 0.02) immunodetection. No differences were observed in the proportion of patients reacting against neuroblastoma-derived human motor neurons. Reactivity against monkey nerve tissue was frequently detected both in patients and controls, but specific patterns were only detected in GBS patients: IgG from 13 (13%) patients reacted strongly against Schwann cells. Finally, we confirmed that IgG anti-GM1 antibodies are associated with poorer outcomes independently of other known prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that (1) GBS patients display a heterogeneous repertoire of autoantibodies targeting nerve cells and structures; (2) gangliosides are the most frequent antigens in GBS patients and have a prognostic value; (3) further antigen-discovery experiments may elucidate other potential antigens in GBS.

Guillain-Barré syndrome after SARS-CoV-2 infection in an international prospective cohort study.

In the wake of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, an increasing number of patients with neurological disorders, including Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), have been reported following this infection. It remains unclear, however, if these cases are coincidental or not, as most publications were case reports or small regional retrospective cohort studies. The International GBS Outcome Study is an ongoing prospective observational cohort study enrolling patients with GBS within 2 weeks from onset of weakness. Data from patients included in this study, between 30 January 2020 and 30 May 2020, were used to investigate clinical and laboratory signs of a preceding or concurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection and to describe the associated clinical phenotype and disease course. Patients were classified according to the SARS-CoV-2 case definitions of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and laboratory recommendations of the World Health Organization. Forty-nine patients with GBS were included, of whom eight (16%) had a confirmed and three (6%) a probable SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nine of these 11 patients had no serological evidence of other recent preceding infections associated with GBS, whereas two had serological evidence of a recent Campylobacter jejuni infection. Patients with a confirmed or probable SARS-CoV-2 infection frequently had a sensorimotor variant 8/11 (73%) and facial palsy 7/11 (64%). The eight patients who underwent electrophysiological examination all had a demyelinating subtype, which was more prevalent than the other patients included in the same time window [14/30 (47%), P = 0.012] as well as historical region and age-matched control subjects included in the International GBS Outcome Study before the pandemic [23/44 (52%), P = 0.016]. The median time from the onset of infection to neurological symptoms was 16 days (interquartile range 12-22). Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection shared uniform neurological features, similar to those previously described in other post-viral GBS patients. The frequency (22%) of a preceding SARS-CoV-2 infection in our study population was higher than estimates of the contemporaneous background prevalence of SARS-CoV-2, which may be a result of recruitment bias during the pandemic, but could also indicate that GBS may rarely follow a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Consistent with previous studies, we found no increase in patient recruitment during the pandemic for our ongoing International GBS Outcome Study compared to previous years, making a strong relationship of GBS with SARS-CoV-2 unlikely. A case-control study is required to determine if there is a causative link or not.

Blocking Placental Class G Immunoglobulin Transfer Prevents NMDA Receptor Antibody Effects in Newborn Mice.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To determine in a mouse model whether neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) blockade prevents the placental transfer of class G immunoglobulin (IgG) derived from patients with anti-NMDA receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis and their pathogenic effects on the fetuses and offspring. METHODS: Pregnant C57BL/6J mice were administered via tail vein FcRn antibody (FcRn-ab) or saline solution 6 hours before administration of patients' or controls' IgG on days 14, 15, and 16 of gestation. Three experimental groups were established: mice receiving controls' IgG, patients' IgG, or patients' IgG along with pretreatment with FcRn-ab. Immunohistochemical staining, confocal microscopy, hippocampal long-term potentiation, and standardized developmental and behavioral tasks were used to assess the efficacy of treatment with FcRn-ab. RESULTS: In pregnant mice that received patients' IgG, treatment with FcRn-ab prevented the IgG from reaching the fetal brain, abrogating the decrease of NMDAR clusters and the reduction of cortical plate thickness that were observed in fetuses from untreated pregnant mice. Moreover, among the offspring of mothers that received patients' IgG, those whose mothers were treated with FcRn-ab did not develop the alterations that occurred in offspring of untreated mothers, including impairment in hippocampal plasticity, delay in innate reflexes, and visuospatial memory deficits. DISCUSSION: FcRn blockade prevents placental transfer of IgG from patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis and abrogates the synaptic and neurodevelopmental alterations caused by patients' antibodies. This model has potential therapeutic implications for other antibody-mediated diseases of the CNS during pregnancy.